1. I admit myopia on this topic.
2. I always admit my use of international tennis players to my great advantage.
3. These people and many opponents are stellar players and people.
4. Blog # “XENOPHOBIA” lists blogs written over the years on this subject.
5. The comments below are repeated, new, and a challenge to those with similar feelings
to explore the issue further. I have several questions that I don’t have the resources
or time to verify.
First- some good local news. Going into the 2016 NCAA Championships three Atlantic Coast Conference men’s tennis teams were seeded in the top six, including #1 Virginia who won the championship. UNC-Chapel Hill won the ITA national indoor title. Wake Forest beat UVA for the Deacons first ever ACC men’s tennis title. The women had some very similar accomplishments.
However, the 2016 French Open results were much the same for American pros. North Carolina’s John Isner making the second round. No other men’s singles in sight for the fourth year in a row. Again our best shows came from John and the Bryan Brothers (both college products), and Serena and Venus (who avoided USTA influences early on). And, of course Shelby Rogers made the quarters, no small accomplishment. Shelby, interestingly, was home schooled.
Here are some questions and “food for thought” for anyone concerned about the future of American tennis:
1. Does the USTA realize they are spending $500,000,000 plus for a roof and that when it is done perhaps no Americans will qualify for the USOPEN?
2. Did we actually spend 17 million dollars on USTA Player Development with this kind of results?
3. What are the plans on the horizon to correct this problem? Are we willing to listen to new or valid suggestions?
4. If so, has this been thoroughly thought out: There is a direct correlation starting from 1970 until 2016 between the number of scholarships given to American college tennis players to the current dearth of highly ranked American pros. Further, an examination of the top ten Americans during the 70’s and 80’s reveals the quality of those players compared to the top ten men and women today. My belief is the best elite training system world wide is the American College/University athletic programs. Ask Isner 1. were you selected for USTA elite programs? 2. Did your participation at GEORGIA prepare you for your best shot at pro tennis? 3. Did you have a scholarship? 4. Would you have selected GEORGIA had they not provided that grant?
5. An e-mail I received from a “tennis person” suggested there was 860 million dollars spent on college tennis programs. Is that true?
6. Want the best rationale for scholarships, from the #1 sport world wide–soccer? Fact: Our men have never won the World Cup. With the advent of Title IX in 1970 our USA women have won three times! The 23 woman roster this time featured all women with college play and college scholarships. I was asked where the Olympic training camp for women was by a colleague from Elon University. Reply: Thirty five miles east. (Six of the twenty three had played for Anson Dorrance’s UNC Tar Heels.)
7. Change comes fast. In 2015 Duke’s women’s golf team finished 2nd in the NCAA. It was on NATIONAL TV. The BLUE DEVILS roster housed no American women. Coaches depend on winning to keep their jobs. I’ll guarantee young women golf coaches made note of Duke’s roster. (And how many good young Asian players are coming along). While this may be new to some it is not to many, myself included. In 1970 the NAIA voted down a “one only international can play in the NAIA Nationals” rule. A grizzled old coach stood and predicted, “…if you allow this, in about two years a Texas team will bring in an all Mexican team and it’s all over!” He was wrong. The next spring Mercyhurst College (PA.) produced the team winner consisting of six “freshmen” from Finland. Our coaches made note of that. I know I did. And you can’t blame the coaches. Our high schools feature African American men’s basketball players almost exclusively. Soon the Colleges followed suit. High school girls, then college women. Perhaps no sport changed ethnicities faster than women’s college basketball from mostly white to mostly black.
My guess is that football and basketball will continue to feature more black players. Not one thing wrong with that. However it has social and sport implications. First is the concussion issue that is on the front burner now. My strong belief is that many black kids join the military because of unfair and limited options. Is it not wrong to steer any group of young people to war’s dangers and horrors? It doesn’t stretch the intellect too far to see similarities with the ever growing dangers of football. Are we forcing some smaller kids into an arena where they are dangerously over matched?
Back to tennis, and there is a connection. As bigger and better athletes reject football and maybe even basketball, wouldn’t it be wise for tennis to make a bee-line to recruit them to the tennis court? I can tell you right now those people are selecting other sports in the South. Soccer and now Lacrosse are draining these guys and girls their way.
Want one main reason? Duh- college scholarships?
A popular and long held notion is that pro tennis youngsters should avoid college. I believe now more than ever those are rare creatures. Most of our elites have come out of a basic structure or path. First the home and the parents: Chris Evert, Jim Connors, McEnroe, the Bryans, the Williams sisters, and the most recent ones Isner, Steve Johnson, and now Shelby Rogers. The best players in the world can be cited (Rafa and Uncle Tony. The Joker is making a case for “best ever” and he came for a one court Serbian town with a woman pro). Most Americans had connections to college tennis, or at least it was in the back of their minds. The next step was the local pros. Try Pete Sampras and Dr. Fischer. Clubs and their pros were a main cog in the wheel.
Another quantum change when so many academies took kids away from their homes too soon. No matter who or how much you pay some one , will they pay the same amount of attention as a loving parent. Some academies were guilty of throw away kids, drugs, limited education, and limited help for those other than the ones who could make the academies shine.
Colleges do a much better job at a more mature age. As academies purport to do, colleges house, feed, train student/athletes with a lot more worthwhile education thrown in. Both are expensive. The expense and the value of scholarships all the more reason to motivate tennis as a sport choice for the talented.
One personal guess is that Title IX was unjustly blamed for some schools who dropped tennis. I wonder how many Athletic Directors silently came to a conclusion similar to this?
- All sports are counted in the standings for our ‘Conference Cup’?
- We are in a conference with four good tennis teams with all foreign teams and we give 8 girls and 41/2 boys grants to internationals.
- I can find a better place for that size of budget.
Families, free play, clubs and pros, junior tournaments, to college. Injury doesn’t take away your education. Maybe four years of college tennis is the answer.
There is one specific place I believe American tennis should focus on getting better. Many high schools don’t have teams. Many teams have limited budgets. Many coaches receive little or no compensation. Many local pros could help train new or limited coaches and players. Some talented players elect to not play high school tennis. My strong belief is that playing for your team is important. And I believe a pro and coach working together can be very productive. The game is the best teacher. To play an extra twenty matches for your high school can’t hurt.
My book, THE LITTLE GREEN BOOK of TENNIS is geared at helping junior and high school teachers, coaches, players and teams. Private funding provided this guide for all 711 boys and girls high school coaches in North Carolina’s public schools.
I am still wondering about data that a group of “worker bees” or tennis organizations could find out.
- I betcha 75% of scholarship aid in tennis goes to internationals.
- I wonder how many at all levels (NCAA I, II, and III, and NAIA, and Junior Colleges) have an all foreign team. State schools?
- What percentage of awards go to predominantly international teams? All conference, all regional, all americans, outstanding player, outstanding freshman?
- How many second children elected another sport after seeing a sibling lose a valuable grant to a first choice school.
- Isn’t it about time some of our organizations screw up their courage and use their time, money and efforts to make these facts available to American parents and players. The USTA, NCAA, ITA, NFHSAA, athletic directors, administrators.
- What legal statute keeps us from taking care of Americans first. What does the legal term “state actor” mean to this issue. What really came down when the ITA voted in an allotment of 50% aid for our kids, then acquiesced to the “big boys”?
- Would anyone foot the bill for a court decision? How about running a bluff. Try this: 1. The NCAA has a ton of money 2. The USTA has a ton of money. 3. The NCAA really cares about the money sports, i.e.foorball and basketball. Tennis, not so much. If the USTA, whose first love is tennis , walked to the courthouse with a big of money, who would blink first?