FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTLESS

FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTLESS

I chose the history of football for my first term paper topic.  Early 1950’s. 

FOOTBALL by Chuck Klosterman (2026 ) is available.  He adds a lot to “kicking the head of the Dane.”

 Mr. Klosterman’s work is unique, well written, thorough, and entertaining.  And frightening. 

He covers sports history, great players and coaches, teams, and fans.

He covers controversial topics (CTE and injury, Gambling, NIL and PORTAL dangers, Salary,  owners, TV limits. Plus others. ) 

Here are some samples:

 HIS GOAL ( page 11 )

*“This is an expository obituary, published before the subject has died, delivered by someone who wants to explain why the victim mattered so much to so many, despite so much evidence to the contrary.”

 On the future of football:  People will always need to watch football.

*“This,  I must concede is true—if the scenario I described were happening today.  But it is not happening today.   It is something that will happen in the future, to different people, and those future people will not be like you.  They will live in a version of society where football stops and no one  cares.  And that is inevitably why I wrote this book.”

NOTE–Klosterman describes this “future scenario” in detail, later in the chapter entitled NUCLEAR  FOOTBALL.

CHILDHOOD ( page 57)

*“ In the summer after fifth grade, I spent a lot of time imagining me and my friends playing football and winning championships. These daydreams were not just mental visions”

Deja Vu. *My small high school played 6 man football.  Mr. Klosterman comments on this 

wide open variation of a game that was fun.  ( Page 77 )

“But 6-man is its own animal, too arcane to be seen as the bastardized version of anything else. It’s structured bedlam with jankier rules….

EDUCATION/TEACHERS (page 120 )

**Here’s what I mean;Let’s say the salary of every public school teacher was tripled over night. A third grade teacher making $45,000.00 a year on Monday is now making $135,000.00 on Tuesday. In the short term, that change would  make little  difference in how well third graders are educated. A teacher doesn’t become a different person just because their paycheck changes. But the long-term impact this would have on education would be seismic. The realization that becoming a public school teacher was now a six-figure profession would change the type of person who decides to pursue teaching as a vocation.

*Every member of society would live a life conditioned to believe that becoming a public school teacher was a rarefied human experience, reserved for the elite and worth whatever sacrifice was necessary in exchange.”

*Triple the average U.S. teaching salary and the public education system is reinvented within ten or twenty years.”

CANADIAN FOOTBALL  (page 208,209 )  

*“ I Love the people of Canada.  They are self-deprecating, well informed, and open to drinking in the afternoon.”  See Joke by Donald Sutherland.

2040 -THE FUTURE (page 246-249)

  • “ College football becomes  a less interesting version of pro football, nothing more than a feeder system for the NFL. That’s the part that is visible.  The invisible part is the corrosion of football participation at the high school level.” 

*So this is how the future will go….

For the next 5-15 years, football becomes eleven more dominant than it is right now. This, incongruously, results from the mismanagement of college football.  ( i.e. the Portal /NIL impact).


*Football is now an exclusively professional pursuit, watched and supported by millions of fans who have no personal relationship to the game itself.The sport has progressed to its social and economic end point. This is where the plane hits the mountain.

Economic escalation has made pro sports fragile.

The NFL’s total revenue hit one billion dollars for the first time in 1988. By 2065 the number will be two hundred billion, and the face value for a ticket will exceed $3000.00 .

*For more than a hundred years the NFL only got bigger and richer.  It was designed only for imperial expansion, which is the only thing it did.  But now it has to somehow get smaller, and that is something it cannot do..

  • “Somewhere in the middle of the current century there will be a panoramic realization about TV advertising.  The realization will be this : It doesn’t work, at least compared to what it costs.”
  • ”…and when it happens the reaction will be startling, unsuspected indifference.” ` ` ` ` `***********************************

This is a timely book.  

Statement from the Intercollegiate Tennis Association (ITA) Regarding the State of College Athletics, Recent Program Eliminations, & International Student-Athletes


This is the link to the ITA  Statement

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MWiaejUXfubelwdH2JQD4bzwSrVJ3_MxWhQq8Qa-OWM/edit?tab=t.0

One topic that has received increased attention is the role of international student-athletes in college tennis. This is a complex matter and requires more nuanced public discourse.

*****************

There are presently approximately 20,000 college tennis student-athletes. It should be noted that without international student-athletes, many programs would struggle to field full rosters. Efforts to limit their participation risk undermining competitiveness, reducing institutional revenue, and ultimately threatening the viability of programs themselves. This is not a hypothetical concern; this is playing out in real time. Recent developments in Idaho, for example, underscore these broader concerns. Athletic directors and coaches across the state strongly opposed proposed legislation (ID S1357) that would have capped international student-athlete scholarships at 10%. Ultimately, the legislation did not pass, but it highlighted how policy decisions can directly threaten the viability of college tennis programs. Efforts to cap international student athlete participation in any U.S. college sport may also run afoul of existing federal and state laws and regulations, risking increased litigation and costs. 

********************

*************************

Age disparities, particularly cases involving significantly older incoming international student-athletes, have drawn understandable review. The NCAA is expected to address eligibility rules in the near future, and moving forward, there must be a fair and consistent framework in which all student-athletes, both domestic and international, compete on equal footing.

******************** 

For those who care about the future of college tennis, there is also a role to play. Supporting local programs through attendance, advocacy, and financial contributions helps ensure these opportunities remain available for future generations. Sustained visibility and investment are critical to the long-term health of our sport.

***************************

“…you gotta know when to fold em. “

Last week more colleges and universities announced dropping varsity tennis teams than anytime in memory.  Several reasons were:

  1. Expense    2. Title IX   3. The new rules (Portal/NIL )   4. Non Revenue, etc. 

Years back I realized this–

“I wonder how many Athletic Directors silently came to a conclusion similar to this? 1. All sports are counted in the standings for our ‘Conference Cup’? 2. We are in a conference with mostly good tennis teams with all foreign  players.  And we give the 8 girls and 4 and 1/2 boys grants to internationals. 3. I can find a better place for that size of budget.

Like a lot of sports, many tennis teams  dominate winning to the DYNASTY level. Those programs become the model.  

Many conference members have followed this path to the point that almost all the members of most conferences feature 90% of scholarships going to international players. 

Some hard facts emerge:

  1.  If all members do this, only one team wins.  Often the same teams win repeatedly.
  2.  It is like a poker game where you always ante up but never win. 

This may be OK for bragging rights and egos of the oil barons and tech billionaires, but last week several “folded”.

FINALLY

FINALLY 

The link below recognizes the  issue International  player’s dominance of American college tennis:

https://www.ncaascholarshipguide.com/blog/ncaa-tennis-scholarships-for-international-vs-u-s-recruits

****************

This week also featured similar observations issued from the John McEnroe Tennis Academy.

( 90% of players are international, i.e. scholarship recipients’)

*******************

EARLIER

******************

What Coaches Are Doing (Tennis-Specific)

Recruiting shift:

  • Less emphasis on high school recruiting
  • More focus on:
    • Experienced transfers
    • “Plug-and-play” singles players

*******************

2024

Earlier I have described how fast international tennis players thoroughly dominated American college tennis rosters .

” My involvement in this tsunami was as a small college Men’s tennis coach. It was tricky in 1970 and it is in 2024.

The NAIA was the first to eliminate quotas.  The coaches repealed the One International eligible for NAIA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP play rule.   

Coach Jim Verdick of Redlands University warned  “…soon some Texas school, with all Mexican pros, will win every year.” He was wrong.  The next year Mercyhurst College  (Pennsylvania ) won featuring  six of six players from Finland won.   The paste was out of the tube. ” (See NEXT PLEASE -www.tomparham.wordpress.com )

Subsequently I tried to make the American basketball world aware of this scenario being repeated in our other sports that had international players. Men and women. That began 55 years ago.

******************

Once I questioned my own persistence to a respected professional. His adamant response was “… worth the effort? You’re damn right it is worth it. It’s our children. Child advocacy !”

*******************

THERE ARE ONLY TWO MAJOR WAYS TO RECOUP PARENTAL/FAMILY INVESTMENT: 1. PRO TENNIS (IN NC ONLY ISNER, WILKISON, AND SADRI MADE ANY LIFETIME $) AND 2. COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS. THE RISING COST OF HIGHER EDUCATION MAKES SCHOLARSHIPS MORE VALUABLE AND MORE APT TO AFFECT THE CHOICE OF SCHOOL AND SPORT TO PURSUE.

******************

Technology makes research easier.  Embedded below is a “jackleg “ effort I made —studying the top college teams in 2025.   Bottom line:  All divisions (NCAA 1, 11, NAIA, JUCOS, men and women averaged about 90% of starters.  And most probably “scholarshipped “ players.  Only NCAA 111 (non- scholarship ) and NCAA 1 women were less than 90%.

!!!!! This has not been properly emphasized–What matters is scholarships.  The starters get the money and they are 90% international.  

A “SCORE ” Agenda Item

I posed this question to Chat/GPT. They cited difficulty, yet offered some “… very strong estimates.”

How many international college basketball players are on the current rosters of the final 16 men’s teams in the 2026 NCAA Division 1 tournament?

  • There are about 60 internationals on the 16 teams combined.
  • The higher their seeding the more internationals.
  • Illinois has 5-7.
  • There has been a sharp upturn over the recent years. There are currently about one thousand women and one thousand men (internationals ) on our D1 rosters.

**********************

Some personal comments from an old tennis coach/”sports fan”

  • College tennis players are better because the money has made college tennis a better option than the tradtional Challenger route.
  • College tennis has become the “minor leagues” of Pro Tennis.
  • 1970-NAIA tennis rosters changed to almost all foreign, almost overnight.
  • Now all divisions of college tennis rosters, save D111, are the same .
  • Scholarships are the only source of aid for American families.
  • Fear of lawsuits has been a major concern.
  • The age of Tennis and Basketball players is a major factor.

Cruel ? Our children ?

Recruiting gossip is no longer about “blue chip” or ” 5 Star “, 17/18 year American high schoolers. Recruiters have a bag of money to offer to “portals”. They are often 23 years old. Some have transferred 3-4 times. We are letting graduate students play. Some are “eligible” six or seven years after admission.

American Tennis families have suffered from this for years. Poor to rich.

Basketball has been a bedrock for mostly poor kids. Will international older players, often with backgrounds of professional play, join tennis in taking away our children’s opportunites ?

This has to be dealt with soon. And it affects many other sports than tennis and basketball.

*****************

Comment

Unlike tennis, I have long thought college basketball needs a wake-up call from arrogant thinking that only Americans can play.  But ,like my thoughts on tennis, a maximum number on the roster (say 12) and only half are foreign, is my first thought solution.

Not sure Trump is the man to solve college sport’s quandaries.  His executive orders (I’ll bet he did not get one out in the week after the roundtable) are half baked and usually create more problems than they fix.  And attendees who have a vested interest (a fat paycheck) in part of the game have trouble seeing the big picture.

James Haslam

SPAM

The Full Monty–The Ides of March, 2026 )

PROLOGUE

DEAR  MR./MS. “SPAM”,

You are in business.  I am not.   Everything  I have written is free to all.

PLEASE QUIT CALLING ME.

*********************

Two Links:  1. The Barton Project ( Earlier selected articles )

https://barton.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=79836717

2.  Subsequent  Selected Articles:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K3qpwHvh4PtTWvhcDcCtVE2CuBBaJ8_JIWuX6fZelb0/edit?tab=t.0

https://littlegreenbookoftennis.com/2025/07/16/nexus/

TIME OUT !